Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 3061 - 3080 of 5,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 11:02 am by Robert Tanha
Beyond this, the applicant provide no further information beyond stating that she felt this treatment was grossly unfair. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy early in the argument sought to test Rienzi on what a state was to do if it had found that one kind of buffer zone law had not worked and so felt a need to adopt a stricter one. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Judge Bissoon felt that Bibby was both questionable and outdated. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am by Jamison Koehler
  820 A.2d 546, 547-48 (D.C. 2003)(citing United States v. [read post]