Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 5,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
This morning, the court is hearing oral arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
As the Court of Appeal in Vescovi v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:21 am
Allen stated that the Department expected officers to be available 24 hours per day via BlackBerry, and officers felt obligated to respond to emails while off duty to improve chances of receiving promotions or coveted assignments. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:08 am
The case, titled Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:46 pm
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's petition for an injunction rehearing relating to the second Apple v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
Justice Ginsburg’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:02 am
§ 101 as directed to patent-ineligible subject matter, the PTAB analyzed the claim utilizing the Mayo framework set forth in Alice v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
Regardless of whether the Supreme Court decides to hear Young v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
Shuman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:12 am
In this case, the Second Circuit says that some non-sexual harassment can determine whether the work environment as a whole created a hostile work environment.The case is Moll v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits based on work-related stressMatter of State Insurance Fund and Workers’ Compensation Board, 2016 NY Slip Op 07734, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentA supervisor [Claimant] filed for workers’ compensation benefits contending that she that had felt threatened as the result of a work-related incident involving one of her subordinates and that the incident had resulted in stress, panic attacks and digestive problems. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:30 am
And with the Ninth Circuit's decision on July 5 in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:00 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in Agrawal is puzzling if not downright shocking to those familiar with the Second Circuit’s decision last April in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:24 am
In the case from last week, US v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
” The language comes from the case of Grutter v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:31 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:57 am
Today the Supreme Court will hear Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:55 am
Grievant admitted he had made the comment but stated he hadn't meant anything by it. [read post]