Search for: "In Re ALLEN " Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 4:42 am by Beatrice Yahia
Jeremy Diamond and Richard Allen Greene report for CNN. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
EU On 7 April 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered his opinion in TU, RE v Google on the question of the specific function performed by search engines in relation to Articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which set out respectively the right to respect for private life, the right to protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information and freedom to conduct business. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am by John Elwood
Back in 2011, so long ago that I hyphenated the term “re-list” like some old-timer, the court twice relisted Witt v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
I will never forget his thesis statement in an argument paper on a great work by Edgar Allen Poe: “The Fall of the House of Usher is about a big house that falls in a lake. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
The recent issue of Environmental Health Perspectives contains several interesting articles on scientific methodology of interest to lawyers who litigate claimed health effects.[1] The issue also contains a commentary that argues for greater transparency in science and science policy, which should be a good thing, but yet the commentary has the potential to obscure and confuse. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
First Amendment Cases In the case of USA v Alvarez (21 March 2011), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused an en banc re-hearing of an appeal in which the Stolen Valor Act 2005 had been struck down. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog also has an article on the recent case of NHS Business Authority v Information Commissioner & Spivack [2021] UKUT 192 (AAC) and how the decision affects the problem data controllers encounter when principally anonymous datasets can re-identify data subjects when taken with other publicly available information. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm by admin
A version of this post appeared previously on Professor Deborah Mayo’s blog, Error Statistics Philosophy. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Ex parte Allen, NO. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
Allen v.State, 636 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla. 1994)(holding that the Courtwas required under Article I, § 17 of the Florida Constitutionto strike down the death penalty for persons under sixteen attime of crime).Respondents make no argument for dismissal of the petitionbeyond its reliance upon Denson. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
Relying on the principles set out in Re S and therefore applying the ‘intense focus’ required by case law to the circumstances of the case, and addressing the issue of proportionality, the claimant was entitled to restrain the defendant’s acts of aerial harassment by injunction and the defendant’s surveillance of the claimant. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  The solicitor for Paul Chambers, David Allen Green, writes about the case in “The Lawyer”. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:46 am by Jim Sedor
      Federal: In Trump’s America, the Conversation Turns Ugly and Angry, Starting at the TopWRAL – Peter Baker and Katie Rogers | Published: 6/20/2018 The politics of rage that animated President Trump’s rise now dominate the national conversation, as demonstrated during the debate over his immigration policy that separated children from parents apprehended at the border. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:29 am by Venkat
Here are the redlines reflecting the key changes to the policy: (See Fox Van Allen, Time: "Like It or Not, Facebook Now Wants to Use You in Ads”.) [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
Allen Stanford, ordering he be kept in jail while he awaits trial on charges alleging he swindled investors out of $7 billion. [read post]