Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Plaintiff-appellant West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, who consist of a group of insurance companies that includes the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (Fidelity) and Federated Mutual Insurance Company (Federated). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm
Can the Anna Nicole Smith Estate be lucky enough to revive her case in the United States Supreme Court twice? [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
Although the decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm
Recently, in March of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided a case that came out of a Michigan lower court regarding a sexual harassment claim. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
On February 23, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, decided the case of In re: Quality Stores, Inc., et al., Debtors; United States of America v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:36 pm
Cooley Law School - Law - United States - Education - Law school [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Gore, Citizens United, the State of the Union address, or a confirmation hearing. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:47 pm
Exhibit A offered in support of that proposition: McKay v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
This unusual question arises from a putative class action pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against the Oakland County Medical Examiner and a putative defendant class of all Michigan counties. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:14 am
Based in Chicago and its suburbs, we represent or have represented clients throughout Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Michigan and all over the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Native Ecosystems Council, et al (collectively NEC) appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Tom Tidwell, the United States Forest Service, et al (collectively Forest Service); Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees Madison County and Beaverhead County; and Intervenors-Appellees Sitz Angus Ranch, et al (collectively Intervenors-Appellees). [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
