Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Specifically, the Court adopted strict scrutiny, a familiar, highly protective test otherwise used in evaluating both governmental interference with fundamental rights and governmental use of suspect classifications. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:41 am by Eliana Baer
There are also gaps in documentation concerning the precise sources and amounts of funds used for the down payment on a residence that the ex-husband jointly purchased with another individual in April 2009 and that is presently listed for sale. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The examiner does not conduct experiments30 and cannot be faulted for an inability to be more precise about how Mitsubishi's test relates to the standard test. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court declared in 1994, in the case, Union Bankers Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm by Jamison Koehler
  And yet this is precisely the scenario envisioned in Long and discussed in Jackson. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
”  Unless the FDA had promulgated a formal “performance standard” by notice and comment rulemaking, no standard existed to be violated. [read post]