Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 3061 - 3080 of 12,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Rosalind English
 It is in fact a mantra of EU law that one of the duties of the Community legislature itself is to ensure “a high level of health protection”; see the ruling by the ECJ and the Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed in case C-491/01 R v Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453 at paragraphs 119-121 and 229-230. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Coral Beach
Brian Ronholm, the director for food policy at Consumer Reports, said too much poultry contaminated with Salmonella ends up on the market and sickens hundreds of thousands of people every year. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The L-1A petition can potentially include details of the organizational structure and staffing levels, showing that AI chatbots effectively supplement the limited human resources. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am by Ilya Somin
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
However, the scope, duration and intensity of a seizure, and any subsequent search, “remain subject to the strictures of article I, §12, and judicial review” (People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476 [1974]; People v Marsh, 20 NY2d 98 [1967]). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm by Matthew Hill
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am by Susan Brenner
[H]e found 386 photographs and 35 video recordings that contained some form of nudity but, in his opinion, the people in each image were obviously adult. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Judge Wood also relied in part upon a wide interpretation of the Supreme Court’s 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
” But, following the lead of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in District of Columbia v. [read post]