Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
” The procedural changes to NLRB election procedures implemented by the quickie election rule place employers at a significant disadvantage when faced with a union demand for an election, Incorporating most of the procedures contained in a 2011 NLRB proposal previously invalidated by the District of Columbia’s district court in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Antitrust is a classic example of regulation in the service of deregulation: a government intervention designed to preserve the functioning of the market in the face of anti-competitive conduct or a systemic market failure. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
A parallel case (Du Daobin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Your Service was “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
” In a March 16, 2015 press release (here), the company stated that it had turned over all of the information that the prosecutor had requested to the Chilean Internal Revenue Service, which the company stated was the proper authority to receive the information. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
Her publications and insights appear in the Health Care Compliance Association, Atlantic Information Service, Bureau of National Affairs, World At Work, The Wall Street Journal, Business Insurance, the Dallas Morning News, Modern Health Care, Managed Healthcare, Health Leaders, and a many other national and local publications. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Co. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
” There’s no digital single market when travellers can't use the services they pay for once they cross a border, linguistic minorities are denied access to cultural works in their native language, innovative services are only available in the big member states because of varying regional hurdles – or UK MEPs are blocked from following the cricket in Brussels. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:06 am
Jordan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:44 am
" See Great Coastal Exp., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
The Bronx Household of Faith invokes the First Amendment’s Free Exercise, Free Speech, and Establishment Clauses to challenge the New York Board of Education’s policy excluding groups engaging in “religious worship services” from using public school buildings after hours. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
Among them: employees “in the financial service industry,” provided they satisfy the exemption’s duties requirement. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
A descriptive mark may nevertheless be registered if it has acquired secondary meaning, that is, if it has become synonymous with goods or services in the mind of the public, and thus effectively identifies these goods or services. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
*****PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
