Search for: "Quality Products, Inc." Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2022, 6:08 am by Florian Mueller
As someone who has published apps, and has a new one (a productivity app) in the works, the kind of astroturfing that offends me more than any other is when lobbyists for Apple and/or Google claim to defend our interests.I'm sure many Ukrainians would be offended if a bunch of lobbyists funded by Russia were running around in D.C. and Brussels, claiming to be representing the Ukrainian population at large while arguing that Ukraine drew first blood and has no right to exist other than… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The court also rejected Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Saab Cars USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:31 pm by WIMS
[#Energy, #Transport, #Land] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:19 pm by Richard Worsfold
This article was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily, part of LexisNexis Canada Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
[#Energy/Electric, #Water] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:41 am by Saul Perloff (US)
”  This representation allegedly led the plaintiffs to believe the product was superior in quality to others. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:24 pm
’ As a result, ‘[t]he brand is a highly regarded, distinctive, and widely known identifier of high quality, therapeutic mattresses, pillows, pads, cushions, slippers and other similar products…. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
Cal. 2003) the court determined that the mark YELLOW CAB was determined generic for taxi service, and in Retail Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
The company voluntarily phased out the production of PFAS in 2002. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The court found that the first statement about where InGen and Dobbins operated didn’t relate to  “an inherent or material quality of the product. [read post]