Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm
Without any empirical data to back me up, I also believe it is likely true what Justice Stevens seemed to suspect in chambers that day—that his famous dissent enjoys surprisingly little support among his law clerks. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:10 am
Your documentary seems especially timely now, with the impending nomination of Justice Stevens’ successor. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 am
The Eighth Amendment is problematic, of course, because it obliges judges to invalidate “cruel and unusual punishments” while providing so little evidence of its meaning that it tempts judges to enforce their own, not the law’s, values. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
The Eighth Amendment is problematic, of course, because it obliges judges to invalidate “cruel and unusual punishments” while providing so little evidence of its meaning that it tempts judges to enforce their own, not the law’s, values. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:24 am
I agree that has little to do with a moral "ought. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:00 am
Steven C. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:04 pm
Thomas "was a little surprised that it was 'the Full Monty'—that he interviewed with the president and vice president," Kozinski told the Journal. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:42 pm
A little surreal. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:46 am
But finally we got a little something to go on on Friday. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm
Federal Election Commission, the Court decided a lot, and thereby left little for other judges and legislators to decide. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Confirmation during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I demonstrate, was a purely partisan political affair, with little opportunity for public input. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Psaty, MD, PhD, said, "There is little evidence for using this drug…. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
Reed, which was Justice Stevens’ last argued case. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
Stevens & Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
On the other side, three Justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, plus the soon-to-retire John Paul Stevens — made it clear on Wednesday that they remain quite firmly opposed to such displays. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
The argument will be the final one for the Term, as well as for Justice Stevens. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
In so doing, he shreds the “parchment barriers” established by our Founders; he forgets, as Steven Pinker has noted: Someone must be empowered to make decisions and enforce laws, and that someone is inherently vulnerable to corruption. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:50 pm
Stevens won the flip. [read post]
