Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 23,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:12 am
In addition, to avoid making deceptive claims about prices, the Bureau recommends avoiding: (i) using the words “sale” or “special” in marketing collateral unless a true price reduction has occurred; (ii) running a “sale” for a long time or repeating it every week; (iii) luring customers with a bargain product that isn’t available and then offer a similar alternative at a higher price (e.g., by having insufficient quantities of the product advertised at a… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:41 am
In Milestone Beverage CC and Others v The Scotch Whisky Association and Other briefly discussed on the IPKat’s Africa IP Highlights 2020 and in greater detail on the Africa Roundup 2020 (free to read) on the Journal of IP Law and Practice (JIPLP), South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the arguments of the Scotch Whisky Association and interdicted the applicants from selling products, namely ROYAL DOUGLAS and KING ARTHUR, purporting to be whisky or whisky… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:59 am
I've seen them as an intervenor in the Nokia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:51 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker Howard, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am
” According to CIP, one of the highest priorities of the partnership’s business model – which CIP alleged to have brought to the partnership – was to acquire, expand, and ultimately sell two of the largest marijuana testing laboratories in California, including one called “Cannalysis. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 10:30 am
Copyright * Bell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:53 am
” After the Supreme court decided the Colorado case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 5:49 pm
” “As early as Schnell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
The AFP v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 10:29 am
LG eBay Isn’t Liable for Selling Recalled Merchandise–Hinton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
Related Cases: Doe I v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm
II, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm
II, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 5:52 am
Certain cases (e.g., WatchMark v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:02 am
As Blinder writes:National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:30 am
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
