Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 3061 - 3080
of 85,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:27 am
This Article takes that old adage head on, and does so through analysis of one of the most controversial cases ever decided by the United States Supreme Court: Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Following the release of any opinions, the Court will hear argument in Polar Tankers, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
According to the Solicitor General, that court struck down portions of a similar law in Healthcare Association of New York State, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
In 1956, in Railway Employees Dep’t v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
In accordance with these new Regulations, in September 2011 the State notified judges that it would reduce its contribution to sitting judges' health insurance premiums by 6% and reduce its contributions to retired judges' health insurance premiums by 2%.The State argued that the Compensation Clause does not prohibit the State from decreasing its contributions to the health insurance premiums because any reduction to judicial compensation was… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
Sheppard Mullin argued on behalf of the prevailing respondent in the first case, Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
Bond v. United States: SCOTUS Interprets Criminal Statute Narrowly to Preserve Federal-State Balance
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
” Stenberg v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:27 am
It is not clear any of the key events occurred in Texas. 3) Failure to State a Claim: McNamee argues that Clemens' complaint is factually insufficient, by failing to allege with specific detail the defamatory statements--when the statements where made, when, to whom--and cites, of course, Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
The case, Moore v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:20 am
The Cato Institute has posted a video of a panel they hosted on Murr v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:36 am
Lee v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:34 am
Today's dismissal of an argued case came in Claiborne v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:28 am
" It also argued that because the cba used the terms spouse as well as significant other, those terms should be interpreted to be interchangeable.Arbitrator Sarah R Cole has issued an award, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
