Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:37 am
The Court declined to review the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Lebamoff v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
" Mixon v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
Although the court finds that plaintiff adequately proved several of her claims (an impressive feat, given that she proceeded pro se), she ultimately loses the case. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:00 pm
While red states jockey with each other to see who can pass the strictest abortion law in the hope that theirs will be the one a future Supreme Court uses to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Price, State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:19 pm
" Reese v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:13 am
For each decision the Supreme Court handed down, the losing party would revise its strategy. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
(April 27, 2010) and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
Well, certainly the parolees suffer irreparable harm if they wrongly lose their parole status; money damages (even if such damages were available against the United States, which for various immunity reasons they are not) can’t compensate for things like liberty and peace of mind, and freedom from persecution, all things that parolees reasonably contend are at stake on their side of the balance. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
Observing that the law recognized “not merely pecuniary” injury but also “personal injury,” Lord Holt stated that “every injury imports a damage” and that a plaintiff could always obtain damages even if he “does not lose a penny by reason of the violation. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
In Villano v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
In this case, the plaintiff loses because the hostility was based on crude managerial practices as opposed to political discrimination.The case is Wrobel v. [read post]
