Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 3061 - 3080 of 45,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 11:56 pm
Back in April, when the Supreme Court denied certiorari for Murphy v. [read post]
The center further argued the ban violates the state constitution, which protects the right of pregnant people to obtain life-saving or health preserving abortions. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
 So some people die -- or have their teeth rot out -- and other people live. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am by Ashwin Sharma
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
"What the future holds: The changing landscape of federal Indian policy.Roadway to reform: Assessing the 2015 guidelines and new federal rule to the Indian Child Welfare Act's applications in State courts.Capital, inequality, and self-determination: Creating a sovereign financial system for Native American nations.Why Indigenous Peoples' property rights matter: Why the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples may be used to condemn … [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Gregg, Justice Kelly dissented from the denial of the application stating that she would vacate the defendant’s sentence because the trial court erroneously punished defendant for exercising his constitutional and statutory rights by assessing 10 points for OV 19 (interference with the administration of justice). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.Of the people involved:Dr. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am by Mary Zambreno
In a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
In March 2017, a judge in Suffolk County, possibly for the first time in this state, granted custody of a child to three people. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
In Gabriele v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 239 A.D.2d 575, the Appellate Division considered the issue.Vincent Gabriele III began working for the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority in 1985. [read post]