Search for: "In re B. G."
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Judge Lamberth told Chief Judge David B. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
John G. [read blog]
18 Jul 2016, 11:23 am
The parties met and then during 2009, the parties engaged in correspondence in which the contractor re-iterated its claim for extra time and compensation and the owner stated that insufficient particulars had been provided. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
[Questions from Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch revisit unresolved issues from 2017-2020.] [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm
Recently, in In re: Facebook Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual Property… [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Quant à la demande de partage de la résidence familiale, puisque la Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité ne contient pas de dispositions précises quant à la liquidation de la part indivise du débiteur, il faut s’en remettre aux principes généraux du droit civil québécois (art. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Conclusions b. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Will the imposition of explicit criteria re “competitive market” and “public interest” cause more mischief, costs and need for protracted and expensive evidence from so-called experts? [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
George G. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
” Id. at *1 (quoting 21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1)(B)).In our experience, most companies, when faced with a competitor that they believe is violating the FDCA (such as by off-label promotion) will tip off the FDA and watch as the Agency comes down upon the miscreant like a ton of bricks. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
EPO to make IPscore available for free (BLOG@IPJUR::COM) Help from the OHIM: CTM e-filing: program compatibility issues (Class 46) European qualifying examinations (EQEs) and languages (IPKat) Applications for geographical indications (GI) and protected designation of origins: BŘEZNICKÝ LEŽÁK, for Czech beer(GI) ; HAJDÚSÁGI TORMA, for Hungarian horseradish (PDO); Faba de Lourenzá for Spanish beans (GI);… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
& Eng'g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
n, Tú Thanh, Dr.Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2010.International ArbitrationK2400 .B67 2010International arbitration and forum selection agreements : drafting and enforcing / Gary B. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IAM)DSS case: Europe’s patent demise: (IPEG),EU calls on US to fulfill TRIPS obligations re copyright: (The IP Factor),How to safeguard unprotected know-how in FP7 projects: (IPR Helpdesk),European Council calls for a free movement of knowledge: (IPR-Helpdesk),Madrid amendments for double-treatied Union members: (IPKat),Proposed Europe-wide rules governing biometric passports are still unsatisfactory despite some concessions, according to European Data Protection Supervisor:… [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Even so, the Gillespies did not meet their repayment obligations.[5]B. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
If it could manifest it would be incomprehensible precisely because it was unrelated to any other will; the "thing in itself" is comprehended only by the self (its internal character cannot be manifested pristinely) B. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, Petitioners,v.YOLANDA LOPEZ, SHERYL HAMER, ELMER DEGUZMAN AND RICHARD WECKER, Respondents.No. 17-0733.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued March 12, 2019.Opinion delivered: May 17, 2019. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Castillo, 444 S.W.3d 616, 620 (Tex. 2014) (op. on reh'g). [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on… [read post]
