Search for: "In re J. C." Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 3:55 pm by Guest Blogger
I admit to shallow knowledge in this field- but a cursory examination of US IP law highlights pretty significant limitations on the use of injunctions in IP cases (17 USC 512(j)). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
De son côté, dès avril 2009, la France a fait part à Panama de son souhait de signer un accord d’échange de renseignements. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:24 am by Brian Fong
” Further, to cure certain technical violations of Labor Code Section 226, an employer must currently re-issue corrected wage statements to all aggrieved employees for the past three years. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by Schachtman
Cir.Ct., Civil Action No. 00-C-1180H, Amended Order Denying Class Certification (Dec. 12, 2001) (Hutchison, J.), 2001 WL 1818442 (Dec 13, 2001). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
In a previous posting by Darren Olivier here, the decision of the American Supreme Court in In re Tam, case 2014-1203 was discussed. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]