Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 29,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2022, 4:37 am
POCA gives the courts the power to make a restraint order freezing the assets of an alleged criminal, with the overall aim of ensuring that the proceeds of crime can be confiscated by the State in the event a crime has been committed. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:15 pm
Second, since the eviction moratorium case, the Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:18 am
In his dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
Under the heading “competing interests,” the authors state that “they have no competing interests. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
In an ironic twist, the Times v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
From Judge Dale Drozd's opinion in Clifton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:08 am
In a post-Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:09 am
Supreme Court Rufo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Since most women will likely live in states with available abortion services, the pill could be used by women in states with abortion bans. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Florio v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Europe The European Data Protection Board published an opinion on data transfers between EU member states and Russia. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
AHA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm
“Dissolution proceedings are designed to dispose of all matters connected with the dissolution of a marriage” Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
While it had been difficult for the UT to provide guidance on awards, it was clear that “the purpose of the repayment regime is not compensatory (an unlicensed HMO may be a perfectly satisfactory place to live)” (as per Rakusen v Jepsen (2020) UKUT 298 (LC) ). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:22 pm
Livingston v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
ASA Ruling on Both Lives Matter poster. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court unanimously held in Gideon v. [read post]
