Search for: "People v White" Results 3081 - 3100 of 6,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm by Jarod Bona
That’s great for the dentists because people watch television and movies, see the actors’ glowing white teeth, and want the same for themselves. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
NFIB weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
” It was long assumed that the right to jury trial meant the right to a jury of 12 persons (originally, white men). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm by Alfred Brophy
Probably most people these days start property with Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by John Bratt
You know, because of that whole thing about it basically leaving out any rights for people who were not white males. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm by David Lat
“When you take money from people, you hurt them indirectly. [read post]