Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 3081 - 3100 of 14,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
An attorney representing a client is entitled to make ‘strategic and tactical decisions concerning the conduct of trials. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
An attorney representing a client is entitled to make ‘strategic and tactical decisions concerning the conduct of trials. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
In updated F-V, 3, the two steps taken by examiners to assess unity of invention, carried over from former F-V, 2, are broken down and explained in greater detail. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
"106 Ultimately, agreeing with the government's new position, the Court determined that "Attorney General Bradford's opinion defies a definitive reading and we need not adopt one here. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am by Michael Lowe
Roving applications have to be approved by the Assistant Attorney General or the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Most committed pro-choicers have exaggerated fears (yes, you’re reading that right) of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 10:31 pm by Florian Mueller
., semi-retirement).The case that generated more publicity for him than any other in his 21 years on the bench has been Oracle v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  IPSO wrongly stated that Hacked Off had not made the evidence publicly available – in fact they had not actually read to the end of the report. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Plaintiff’s factual allegations fail to establish that but for defendants’ alleged negligence in not calling the cooperative’s attorney to testify in the Supreme Court action, the attorney’s testimony would have established that the unit was validly transferred to him at a July 1995 closing (see generally Ambase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]