Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 2:50 am
Comerica Bank – Protecting Consumers Against Mishandled Electronic Funds The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently issued an order in the case of Sparkman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:19 am
Corcino & Associates et al., CV 13-3728 GAF (JCx), United States District Court Central District (October 7, 2013). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
United States, 526 U.S. 314, 326 (1999). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:27 pm
" So states the majority opinion of the Supreme Court of California today in a ruling that issued in the case captioned Balboa Island Village v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am
The sections on what constitutes a search are updated with cases like United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
I previously posted here about a case in front of the United States Supreme Court that deals with how far does the rule from Georgia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
California Coastal Comm'n, 73 Cal. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Pfizer stated that Corber v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; see, e.g., People v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
In October 2011, a putative class action was filed in state court in Bridewell-Sledge v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
United States Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:57 pm
The New Mexico case is Garcia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
(“SIP-IP”) of Irvine, California, that Veridus Group has not infringed SIP-IP’s rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 5,294,263 for the mark VERI-SITE. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
Moreover, California appellate courts apply intervening state supreme court rules retroactively when reviewing cases, even if the judgment in the trial court was entered prior to the supreme court ruling (Vazquez v. [read post]
