Search for: "State v. Frank"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 4,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Following Montgomery v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:48 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Collins v Mnuchin. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Following Montgomery v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:34 am
In Bridges v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Burford v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
United States and Palomares v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
National Australia Bank (OT09), United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:03 am
In Washington State Grange v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm
These included two that reached the Supreme Court: Powell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
B-DC: PACA claims are trust, not secured claims, so no req't (as per §506b) that claim be oversecured to get atty fees. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/JK-BK-DC-TEEL-10-4-11.pdf … B-AL: Truck lease w/ "Terminal Rental Adjustment Clause" (TRAC) is "true lease" and not lease intended as security. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HB-BK-ND-AL-CADDELL-9-29-11.pdf … B-OH:… [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:45 am
But there is a huge obstacle in the way of such frank and open discussions, in the shape of the ongoing lawsuit against Georgia State. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Janus, et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
v. [read post]
