Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 157,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: This brief case comment explains how the Supreme Court’s very narrow hunt for individual clues in Bittner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:15 pm
: Might we see a Giuliani v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm
Christian Turner (University of Georgia Law School) has posted State Action Problems on SSRN. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 12:30 pm
Red Hail is a canonical case in family law jurisprudence. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Sveen v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
The section further provides: "The term applies to an offense described in this paragraph whether in violation of Federal or State law." [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
On Friday, I posted the complaint for BIA v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:47 am
The victory for states came in Allen v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm
In January 2023, a federal district court in Texas dismissed Michael v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees quickly rose to landmark status in employment law. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:18 pm
In Boutelle v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Yaron Shaham The post Plaintiff as “Master of the Claim” May Base his Claims on Only State Law to Avoid Federal Jurisdiction under CAFA appeared first on CAFA Law Blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 8:25 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:07 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law United States District Judge John G. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
Toth v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:08 am
As we reported, on June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
State. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Therefore, it is the well established law of this State that issues of credibility and the appropriate weight to give to a witness's testimony are for the jury, and it is impermissible, as a matter of law, for a witness to give an opinion on the credibility of another witness.At trial, petitioner was asked five "were-they-lying" questions. [read post]
