Search for: "State v. Register" Results 3081 - 3100 of 13,695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
" - Winston Churchill (United States Constitution) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am by D. Todd Smith
Register by mailing a $25 check payable to "Civil Appellate Section" to Matthew Ploeger at Vinson & Elkins LLP, 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78746, no later than April 20, 2012. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am by D. Todd Smith
Register by mailing a $25 check payable to "Civil Appellate Section" to Matthew Ploeger at Vinson & Elkins LLP, 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78746, no later than April 20, 2012. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:55 am by Mathews P. George
When registered, the State bestows the registered proprietor of the trademark with the exclusive right to the use of the trademark in relation to the goods or services in respect of which the trademark is registered. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
Register No. 156 at page 46690 (August 14, 2006).OSEP has published a model form for prior written notice consistent with current statutory and regulatory requirements. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
Register No. 156 at page 46690 (August 14, 2006).OSEP has published a model form for prior written notice consistent with current statutory and regulatory requirements. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by Steve Hall
"State lawmakers voted to increase the penalties - including life in prison and death - facing repeat child molesters.House Bill 2965, by state Rep. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:44 am by Marty Schwimmer
I use a lot of ‘possibly’s and ‘maybe’s because we also don’t know for sure what the state of the Chinese register was in December 2009, and what an investigation of the Chinese register would have produced at that time. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
The accused was charged for possession of goods, for the purpose of trade, to which a registered trade mark was falsely applied under section 49(c) of the TMA. [read post]