Search for: "United States v. Age" Results 3081 - 3100 of 7,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 11:48 pm by admin
  The musical works at issue in this case, having been in the public domain, were performed freely around the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
The ADEA is a federal anti-discrimination law which prohibits employers from using age as a basis not to hire, to fire, or otherwise discriminate against employees.Prior to the appeal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had dismissed Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:07 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Prior to the appeal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had dismissed Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:07 am
The ADEA is a federal anti-discrimination law which prohibits employers from using age as a basis not to hire, to fire, or otherwise discriminate against employees.Prior to the appeal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had dismissed Mr. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
Carpenter’s attorneys argue modern cellphone records are fundamentally different than phones used in 1979 and that a more recent Court decision from 2012, United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am by Christine Corcos
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
On January 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa declared this law unconstitutional in Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:45 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Earlier this year the United States Supreme Court ruled in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]