Search for: "Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply brief [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
Opinion below   (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief for petitioner Docket: 08-673 Title: Clark v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:58 pm by Rick Hasen
The court affirmed the 7th Circuit, making the bad law apply to the entire country, and not just a part of it. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
The Court also is aware that separate three-judge panels of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals have issued unpublished opinions finding that the movants' Rule 59(e) motions were successive motions attacking their convictions and sentences under § 2255. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am by mjpetro
On appeal, Linzy challenges his conviction arguing that the district court abused its discretion in restricting defense counsel's cross-examination of his co-defendant Jones. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dunkel, 927 F.2d 955, 956 (7th Cir. 1991). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:33 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held here, legally irrelevant to the predominance inquiry under FRCP 23(b)(3). [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:17 am
The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Craigslist is not liable for discriminatory housing messages posted in its forums. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am by Aaron Weems
This decision comes on the heels of last month’s First Circuit Court of Appeals in Massachusetts ruling on Section 3 of the DOMA and continues the successful attacks on the constitutionality of the 1996 law. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
On appeal, the Seventh Circuit found Paragraph 12 to have substantially greater potential for confusing unsophisticated consumers than did this Court. [read post]