Search for: "DOE v. Smith"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 6,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 7:16 am
Smith granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss various claims. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Smith signalled a possible 180. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
As always, they will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002] [defendant could be… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The opinion, by an Illinois trial court, is at Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:29 am
Here is the decision: Scardina v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reached that conclusion concerning transgender status in Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
Smith, 105 F. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
SMITH, IV, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
The first case of the day will be Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
Does — will that affect them? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., No. 12-245, and Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:16 pm
”); Smith v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
In an en banc ruling today in US v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:44 am
Summary of Decision issued May 14, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: DeLoge v. [read post]
