Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 3101 - 3120 of 7,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 3:44 am by SHG
(The “x” in Mx. is meant to represent an unknown, similar to the use of x in algebraic equations.) [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
As a thought experiment, consider country X where the public service broadcaster (PSB) is not sufficiently protected from government interference. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We have also found that a patent applicant need notexpressly state “my invention does not include X” toindicate his exclusion of X from the scope of his patentbecause “the patentee’s choice of preferred embodimentscan shed light on the intended scope of the claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:59 am by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
When speaking to a patent attorney, he will then say “I invented a product/process that works like x and is different from the prior art for y reasons. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Jeff Welty
Prolonged surveillance reveals types of information not revealed by short-term surveillance, such as what a person does repeatedly, what he does not do, and what he does ensemble. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Jeff Welty
Prolonged surveillance reveals types of information not revealed by short-term surveillance, such as what a person does repeatedly, what he does not do, and what he does ensemble. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 12:58 pm by David Post
Among other undesirable consequences, the American Rule encourages, or even invites, a particularly nasty form of litigation bullying: filing lawsuits with little or no hope of prevailing in order either to extract a settlement payment (“I’ll take $X to go away, which is less than the $10X you’ll have to spend defending the case”) or to force a defendant to “cease and desist” from perfectly lawful behavior that the plaintiff would like to… [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 5:48 am by Edward Smith
Prehospital and Hospital Evaluation of Chest Trauma I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Trucking Accident Lawyer. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 8:53 am by scottgaille
As the former president of a PE company, I experienced the drag along firsthand. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 8:53 am by scottgaille
As the former president of a PE company, I experienced the drag along firsthand. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:01 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Trouble is, he plays my kind of music where nobody else does, loads of funk, soul and acid jazz. [read post]