Search for: "Dean v. Dean"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
An associate dean at the University of Virginia has filed a $7.5 million libel lawsuit against Rolling Stone magazine, claiming he was portrayed as the “chief villain” in its now-retracted article about a gang rape on campus. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
”Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Thus, the final reading for the course will be Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
In this respect, courts may eventually consider adopting a nuanced approach and applying all or part of the following test: When (i) in light of the applicable methods and canons of construction, a statute allows a margin of interpretation, (ii) the administrative interpretation of the statute remains within this margin, and (iii) the applicable international, constitutional, statutory, or other constraints permit or, at least, do not exclude judicial deference either generally or in… [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:30 am
" "Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:47 am
Last week’s arguments in US v. [read post]
Labels Matter: How Professor Jack Balkin Snookered Justice Kagan and Others to Fuel Faux Originalism
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallIn 2007, Professor Jack Balkin of Yale Law School shocked the academic world by arguing that Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Or progressives might employ what Tara Leigh Grove calls “flexible textualism” to insist that the state attend to the functional preconditions for the realization of enumerated rights, as when the plaintiffs in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm
They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Initially the opposition was based on a whole host of grounds, starting with the Trade Marks Act 1996, section 8 on the grounds that BETPACK (i) did not fall within the definition of a trade mark, (ii) was devoid of distinctive character, (iii) consisted exclusively of signs or indications which may designate characteristics of the goods, (iv) was of such a nature as to deceive, (v) was such that its use would be prohibited by enactment or rule of law. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
On Day 1, the conference kicked off with the Keynote Session after a warm welcome from the Dean of the Law Faculty at the University of Cape Town (UCT), Professor Danwood Chirwa. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court in a landmark 1968 decision, Terry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:54 pm
Indeed, in Golden IT, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
That is the question the justices will consider next Wednesday in Banister v. [read post]
