Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 3101 - 3120 of 12,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 9:37 am
” In defendants’ view, “Imagine” is a secular anthem caught in a loop of history recycling the same arguments from years past through to the present. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The statute, though, does not mention officers. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
I've read through Jose Padilla's motion (written by the Federal Defender's Office -- Michael Caruso, Orlando do Campo, and Tony Natale) to dismiss for outrageous government conduct, which I originally covered last week here. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Michael O'Hear
In any event, here’s what she said in Bullcoming: I highlight some of the factual circumstances that this case does not present. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a rather scathing decision in Hurst v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on GoDaddy.com, LLC, Wild West Domains, LLC, Enom, Inc., Domains By Proxy, LLC, Webair Internet Development, Inc., and Google, Inc. for the limited purpose of identifying the Doe Defendants and Roe Corporation Defendants in this case. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Ilya Shapiro
Like most immigrants, he does a job few native-born Americans will: defending the Constitution. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:45 am
Earlier this month I testified in Gusciora v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded that the subpoena would be enforced only if plaintiff could provide a "prima facie showing" on its claim of defamation, based on "evidence satisfying the summary judgment standard" (the Delaware Doe v. [read post]