Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc."
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Infogroup, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
This list does not attempt to include all important decisions of those two courts that were rendered in 2022. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Choice of Law In addition to the arbitration clause, the Bermuda Form includes a unique choice-of-law provision which selects as the governing law the law of the State of New York on substantive issues of law, and the law of the United Kingdom on procedural issues. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Choice of Law In addition to the arbitration clause, the Bermuda Form includes a unique choice-of-law provision which selects as the governing law the law of the State of New York on substantive issues of law, and the law of the United Kingdom on procedural issues. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
The business, known as The Commercial Driver’s License School, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:01 am
Suchanek v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine does not. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
While employers can design their group health plans to apply higher out-of-pocket limitations on coverages for non-essential benefits and out-of-network care, employers are cautioned to use care to ensure both that: The plan properly essential and non-essential health benefits, both in terms and in operation; and The application of higher out-of-pocket limitations for non-essential benefits does not violate other federal health plan rules such as special federal health plan rules regarding… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
An employer determining that an individual with an actual, perceived or record of disability should be prepared to show that this determination was made either without regard to the individual’s disability or that the individual does not qualify even with reasonable accommodation, that accommodation would be unreasonably costly, or accommodation could not eliminate the safety or other proven barriers to qualification of the individual for the position. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Ethnicity, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 6:59 am
Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
But suppose instead, a thief, who does not work at Microsoft, breaks into Microsoft headquarters via a basement window at midnight, reads Microsoft’s CFO’s papers about an upcoming positive earnings announcement and then buys Microsoft stock before that announcement. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
Why does any of this matter? [read post]
