Search for: "Does 1-100 " Results 3101 - 3120 of 12,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stefanie Levine
— (1) DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stefanie Levine
— (1) DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Gene Takagi
Notice 2018-100 Notice 2018-100 provides for waiver of the additions to tax for underpayment of estimated income tax for tax-exempt employers to the extent that they underpay their estimated income tax due to changes to the tax treatment of certain QTFs. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:39 am
"And I still have to "press 1" for English!?!?!?!? [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:37 pm
Note that competition does not reduce the price of cards because of a kind of arbitrage and adverse selection; if $95 gave the recipient a card that could be exchanged for $100 worth of goods, then customers ready to make normal cash purchased would buy cards and quickly redeem them. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 12:02 am by Jeff Nowak
It does not matter whether: 1) the closure occurs before or after the law takes effect on April 1, 2020; 2) an employee is on leave when closure occurs; 3) an employer furloughs an employee; or 4) the work site temporarily closes and the employer says it will reopen in the future. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Decision T 274/95, which has been cited by the [patent proprietor] does not say otherwise. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:14 am by Gene Takagi
If the AG does not receive the information needed to resolve the suspension within 30 days of the issuance of the notice, the registration is suspended. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is clear that the addition of two new independent claims cannot be admissible because this addition, which does not have any effect on the fate of claim 1 that has been challenged, cannot be considered to be a limitation of claim 1 itself in response to a ground for opposition that has been invoked against it. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Each takeaway is listed below, including the first three specific ones that the Appeals Board discusses in its opinion, along with some quotable quotes: 1. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the board observes that claim 1 does not require that the damping ratio remain fixed throughout a maneuver. [read post]