Search for: "Ex Parte United States" Results 3101 - 3120 of 5,111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm by John Day
The United States Supreme Court has released its opinion in U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:34 am by Ben Vernia
., a California-based biotechnology company, has agreed to pay the United States $24.9 million to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kappos, as published in the Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (reproduced below). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
POWELL: Oh absolutely, and so the estimates that currently 4.1 million disabled parents exist in the United States is certainly an underestimate, by and far. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm by Jason Rantanen
  The idea of notice involves: Public disclosure of: -existence-ownership-scope of rightsThis lets innovators: -Ex ante license-AvoidGeneral point of view: patent system in the United States operates as a tax on innovation outside the area of pharma. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am by Florian Mueller
The United States International Trade Commission recently postponed its decision on Samsung's complaint against Apple until May 31, 2013 and raised additional questions relating to FRAND licensing obligations and the impact of an exclusion order. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
I begin with this post, which first appeared here in October 2009, called "The Church, (P)ECUSA and the DFMS", with newly updated links and facts:* * * *I have been asked to explain the difference between "the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America" and the "Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:12 am by Ritika Singh
Tensions keep escalating between the United States and North Korea: Agence France Presse reports that the latter has now authorized plans for nuclear strikes on the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am by Dennis Crouch
Clarified that § 11.305 (relating to prohibited ex parte communications with, e.g., judges, administrative patent and trademark judges, and "employee[s] or officer[s] of the Office") does not "prevent ex parte communication that is authorized by law, rule or court order, in an ex parte proceeding." [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:04 am by Dennis Crouch
As a side note, Novartis's US application for the free base of Imatinib -which was the crystalline form —issued as a patent in the United States in 1996 owing to a 1993 filing date. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am by Anubha Sinha
 Next I wrote about a local Court in Gurgaon granting an ex-parte interim injunction against Viacom 18 Pvt Ltd., restraining them from using the trademark ‘Nautanki’ and the accompanying logo last week. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm by Florian Mueller
Patent No. 7,469,381, against which an anonymous party requested an ex parte reexamination. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
The flexibility of antitrust law in adapting to new industries and modes of anticompetitive conduct is also a source of frustration, because the ex ante application of the domain’s broad principles to particular business practices is tricky to forecast without highly intensive, fact-specific analysis. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:26 pm by Ken
You may recall that when United States District Judge Otis D. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:48 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:00 pm by Florian Mueller
The first part -- "based only on the value of the component that implements the standard" -- is an argument Apple emphasizes all the time in the policy and antitrust contexts (as well as in litigation). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Ken
United States District Judge Michael M. [read post]