Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown" Results 3101 - 3120 of 9,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2017, 5:36 am by SHG
Is Lilla “very critical” of Black Lives Matter? [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
Redish is wrong (or, for the reasons discussed above, is right but it doesn’t matter)? [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Thus, where the declarant is a witness at trial, testified on the same matter, and was subject to cross-examination, prejudice does not result. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm by Ilya Somin
Somin says, no matter what one’s views of the ethics of the Supreme Court Brown v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 11:43 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  I noted then that it seemed that after the Appellate Division’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:36 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
We do not pursue this matter further because whether he is subject to the UCMJ or not, Trump could fire him for disobeying an order in any event.) [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Orin Kerr
Judge Brown dissented, reasoning that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule should apply. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:37 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Agenda at a GlanceWelcome Dinner & GalaOctober 12, 20176:00 pm – 9:00 pm 6:00 – 6:30 pm Arrival 6:30 pm Dinner Service Begins 6:45 – 7:10 Recognition of 2017 California Bar Foundation Diversity Bar Review Scholarship Recipient ​ 7:15 – 7:30 pm Presentation of Outstanding Achievement in California Indian Law Award 9:00 pm Gala Concludes Conference PanelsOctober 13, 20178:30 am – 5:00 pm 8:30 – 8:50 … [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by Tammy Binford
” Jo Ellen Whitney, an attorney with the Davis Brown Law Firm in Des Moines, Iowa, explains that the law allows employees to comment on workplace conditions and employers aren’t allowed to discipline employees for attempting to organize, “and the NLRB has traditionally read that very broadly, allowing commentary on a wide array of work conditions including wages, benefits, supervisors, and similar matters. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Robert T. Quackenboss
Retailers might consider this factor in deciding whether, and to what extent, to litigate and appeal matters to the NLRB. [read post]
Retailers might consider this factor in deciding whether, and to what extent, to litigate and appeal matters to the NLRB. [read post]