Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 3101 - 3120 of 6,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 4:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Justices Seem Skeptical of Vermont Law Restricting Use of Prescriber-Identifiable Data - Washington, DC lawyer Anna Kraus of Covington & Burling on the firm's blog, Inside Privacy Public Access Issues Under The Shoreline Management Act - Seattle attorney John Lenker of Mikkelborg Broz Wells Fryer on the firm's blog, Seattle Maritime Law Federal Circuit Provides New Rules for Post Injunction Contempt Proceedings in TiVo v.… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Call In the Green Deal Coalition - Philadelphia LEED AP Shari Shapiro on her Green Building Law Blog Law Is Made On A Lawyer's Desk: Thoughts On The Supreme Court's Pending "Judicial Taking" Case - Philadelphia lawyer Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Never Underestimate the Value of Face Time: Kersey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Nathaniel Persily at the Stanford Lawyer, Rick Hasen at Slate (who also notes an error in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court at his Election Law Blog), Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, and Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 November 2015, HHJ Stephen Davies handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Ragozzino [2015] EWHC 3232 (QB). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The motion, tabled by David Davis MP, calls for an “end [to] this serious attack on free speech by withdrawing the proceedings for contempt; further asserts the fundamental right of hon. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The US Supreme Court issued a unanimous benchslapping to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ayestas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Lyle Denniston
Examining the Supreme Court’s most significant ruling on a claim of innocence based on new, post-trial evidence — Herrera v. [read post]