Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 29,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:14 pm
Lozano v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Cantore v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
I've had the chance to read the decision and would like to share only a few high-level observations here.Conti was lucky that the case got reassigned to the Delaware Chancery Court's Vice Chancellor (= judge) Nathan A. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
Attorney offices are (1) held in fairly high esteem, and (2) enable even low-level attorneys to be exposed to some pretty interesting stuff. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:59 pm
The case of Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm
"But State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 4:32 am
Though Armenia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:09 pm
The following claim terms were construed by the Court: “steady state blood levels of doxycycline of a minimum of 0.1 μg/ml and a maximum of 1.0 μg/ml” “steady state blood levels of the doxycycline of between 0.3 μg/ml to 0.8 μg/ml” “pellets” “pellet” “coated with at least one enteric polymer” Galderma Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
He held that, given that the children themselves were pleaded as victims of discrimination in this case, it was relevantly different from the previous benefits cap case, and their rights should be construed in light of the UNCRC “which identifies the level of consideration which should have been given to their interests before subjecting their households to the revised cap” [76]. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
V. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:45 pm
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
This is a trial level decision. [read post]