Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
It is unsurprising that Lord Justice Leveson recommended that these provisions be repealed (Report, Part L, Chap 1, para 51). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
The court’s decision in City Walk – Urban Mission Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 1:32 am
UK Government Minister for Faith On 9 July 2024, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed that Lord Khan of Burnley, who was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Ministry, will be Minister for Faith. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:26 am
Now, the Court of Appeal was dealing with a question of trespass to land but, having regard to the House of Lords’ remarks in Fisher v Brooker, may be worth bearing in mind in intellectual property cases as, generally, an IP owner seeks an injunction when their rights are being infringed [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
I’m not saying Lord of the Flies, but just really nasty, bullies. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:50 pm
Maybe it was just a bad day, and Lord knows we’ve all had those. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:32 am
Lord Pannick suggested shortly before the election that prisoners may be entitled to around £750 compensation if denied the vote. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:50 pm
In the 1973 Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
I’m not saying Lord of the Flies, but just really nasty, bullies. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 am
The UK had attempted to appeal the recent decision in Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Listening to the well-rehearsed arguments will be Lords Walker and Collins and Lady Hale.Anti Copying in Design -- better known as ACID -- has just released its latest newsletter. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 9:42 am
’” The Report and Recommendation in Ripley v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 12:22 pm
Discussion This decision deals with two issues which have recently been dealt with by the UK Supreme Court (formerly known as the House of Lords). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:55 am
The case of Gas and Dubois v France. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
Applying the decision in Bolton Metropolitan District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1993] 71 P & CR 309 Treacy J accepted that the reasoning provided by the Commissioner was both adequate and intelligible. [read post]
