Search for: "May v. State" Results 3101 - 3120 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2008, 4:55 pm
Thomas is that it states that the Judge, in his May 15, 2008, decision, brought the April 29, 2008, decision in Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
Sage has just brought out a 4-volume set on State of Social Justice in India edited by Ranabir Samaddar. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:51 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
      Transnet SOC Ltd v Tipp-Con (Pty) Ltd and Others (797/2022) [2024] ZASCA 12 (31 January 2024) This blog was co-authored by Felix le Roux, Trainee Associate. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State Legislature in August 2011 amended Civil Service Law §167.8 to provide that “The president [of the Civil Service Commission], with the approval of the director of the budget, may extend the modified state cost of premium or subscription charges for employees or retirees** not subject to an agreement referenced above and shall promulgate the necessary rules or regulations to implement this provision. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:30 pm by Mukund Rathi
 Finally, because O’Handley brought a claim against the Secretary of State directly, he may have a remedy. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  inBaker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuworth, LLC v Comprehensive  Mental Assessment & Medical Care, P.C.; 2011 NY Slip Op 31385(U) ;May 10, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County ;Docket Number: 016008/2007; Judge: Ira B. . [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
" It also limited TCEQ to exercising control over the places and conditions under which those materials may be burned. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 11:46 am
In addition, we reiterate that a judge of the superior court generally may not overturn the order of another judge unless the record shows the other judge is unavailable.And on the federal side of things, today's DJ has H&L's John Querio and Lacey Estudillo discussion of BP PLC v. [read post]