Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 7,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
A trio of professors were on hand to offer their expert opinions, and the panel was ably chaired by a fourth, Professor Paul Torremans from the University of Nottingham. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:19 pm
Because no party to the underlying litigation argued in favor of § 3501's constitutionality in this Court, we invited Professor Paul Cassell to assist our deliberations by arguing in support of the judgment below.As it happens, Dickerson won (Dickerson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
It may not be Alice v CLS Bank International all over again, but Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales from 13 November, shows that when it comes to disqualifying computer software from patentability [or patent eligibility, as the Americans prefer to call it] on the basis that it doesn't disclose an invention, the Brits can do the job at least as elegantly as… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
In Holler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:47 pm
By Paul Kehoe and Gerald L. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:14 am
They will be arraigned on the charges in the Indictment before United States Magistrate Judge Paul E. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:37 am
Our lead sponsors TDS will also be there to discuss any issues you may have regarding deposits. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
In his column for The New York Times, Paul Krugman criticizes the challenges, arguing that “the Supreme Court may be willing to deprive millions of Americans of health care on the basis of an . . . obvious typo. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:32 pm
Paul Morris responds for the prosecution: Maj. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
And the Supremes agreed.Yesterday, they issued their opinion in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Simons Waterfront, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 6:10 am
(A certain Managing Editor may also make an appearance in a bunny suit.) [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Justice John Paul Stevens said as much in a strident dissent. [read post]
