Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS" Results 3101 - 3120 of 7,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm by Tom Goldstein
The next case is McDonald v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Steven Vladeck argues that “[i]f the Court embraces the government’s position in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Scott Bomboy
The question indirectly came before the Supreme Court in 1870 in a case called Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the court’s ruling in Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by David Stras
EPA, which permits the judiciary a more active role by permitting states to challenge administrative rules in certain circumstances. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Justice Stevens apparently took a stand against ID fees in order to remain consistent with Harper v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]