Search for: "Smith v. Day"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
They fall into the hands of juveniles, criminals, and the mentally ill virtually every day of the year. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
Eliot Spitzer, et al., v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:22 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
In fact, L’Abbate moved to be relieved as Marcum’s counsel due to the potential conflict and the motion was not decided because the Litigation settled two days after it was filed (see Conway v Marcum & Kliegman, LLP, et al, NY County (Index No. 652236/2014), Dkt Nos. 605, 611, 617). [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
That's Systems Division Inc v Teknek Holdings Ltd and others [2007] CSOH 85. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The court in that case, Fields v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER, CHARLES WESTBROOK, RICHEY OLIVER, CRAIG PORTER, SHARON WEBER, JUNE SMITH, RITA BAKER, STEPHANIE PEDDY, BILLIE RUTH HODGES, DALLAS CHRISTIAN, AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Fourteen days later, Mr. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
That requires some examination, not just of the regulation itself, but of the FDA's rationale for it.We could go back in time to our Bone Screw days and draw on some examples there, because we did this a lot back in the day. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Smith, 578 F.2d 1197, 1199 (7th Cir. 1978), then citizens criticizing a police officer must be entitled to the same. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Smith denies “any relationship with” the Patriot Boys leader, but Texas Monthly corresponded with a source in the Patriot Boys who claimed their leader had stayed on the ranch for three months after an introduction to Smith. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The court began by distinguishing a 1968 precedent, Smith v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Schs. v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am
Smith, 459 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2006). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
