Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
Not really. v. # 13 Dept. of Justice Wait, we already covered this under Eric Holder. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Holder, involving an earlier challenge to the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Newton v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
Munich v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
Holder, 08-495). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am
Holder (D.D.C. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:48 am
As I’ve pointed out before, the more broadly stated the LLC’s purpose clause, the more difficult it is for a non-controlling member to state a claim for dissolution under the first prong. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Does the possibility of forfeiture of domain names substantially empower the rights holders? [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:19 am
Cir. 1983) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:38 am
Hayashi The Supreme Court of Florida in Bartram v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
Essentially, the State argues that the target of MoveOn.org’s parody (Governor Jindal) is not the holder or owner of the mark (the State). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:20 pm
” Lewis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:53 pm
TD Bank N.A. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
” Indeed, as the court stated in 2010 in Holder v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
Holder (2009). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
At Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen links to the briefs filed by seven states and by former Department of Justice Officials as amici in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:09 pm
(28) Negusie v. [read post]
