Search for: "State v. Square" Results 3101 - 3120 of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm by Stuart Kaplow
How many birds will actually be saved by the new law is debatable but it will have limited application in that it only applies to “new construction of buildings that are not publicly funded and have 50,000 square feet or more of gross floor area, or in downtown Columbia 10,000 square feet or more, .. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am by Rosalind English
The individual conscience is free to accept such dictated law, but the State, if its people are to be free, has the burdensome duty of thinking for itself. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
  In RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 871, 30 August 2013, Middleton J confirmed that the question of patentability under Australian law is to be guided by the seminal and watershed decision of the Australian High Court in NRDC v Commissioner (1959) 102 CLR 252. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:52 am
We're pleased to report on another preemption victory, Horne v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:20 am by Ronald Mann
So why shouldn’t that just follow squarely from the text referring to “operates like an injunction. [read post]