Search for: "Brown v. Justice" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am by John Steele
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 - “Campaigns for Judicial Office: The Impact of Caperton v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The trial had been due to begin on 4 February 2019 before Mr Justice Mann. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the court’s decision. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In a case arising out of Wisconsin earlier this week, much attention was paid to a concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who invoked Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
” The editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to grant review in the case of Louisiana death-row inmate David Brown and argues that the case is “a good example of how every part of the justice system bears some responsibility for not fighting prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
A ruling extending that reasoning beyond capital cases “could be the Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
The question whether a person is a “worker” is to be determined by reference to the principles laid down by the Court of Justice set out above, which exclusively define a worker (see, for example, Brown v Secretary of State for Scotland Case 197/86 at [22]). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am by WSLL
The district court, relying on this Court’s decision in Streets v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:49 am by Mark Murakami
Consider the case of Seaman Alexander Holmes, a deckhand on the M/V William Brown. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:13 am by HRWatchdog
Chamber attorney Andrew Pincus, partner at Mayer Brown, countered that the Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In one of the first decisions to consider the new rules on summary proceedings, Justice Snider in Wenzel Downhole Tools Ltd. v. [read post]