Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3121 - 3140 of 112,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2015, 10:41 am by Michael Risch
This last week, 42 professors sent a letter to Congress opposing the Defend Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:57 am
Even if defendant’s arrest was illegal, the exclusionary rule does not bar testimony of defendant assaulting the officer during the arrest. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:37 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held:I conclude that the Government’s decision to prosecute Defendants does not constitute a substantial burden on Defendants’ religious exercise. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:16 am
I don't think this is low at all, but the anti-Kavanaugh media seem to be working off a theory that says that any attempt to defend Kavanaugh is an attack on the alleged victim. [read post]
However, the court explained that the manager’s knowledge that a hazard could arise at any given moment “does not automatically impute instantaneous knowledge of when those hazards come about. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:34 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:44 am by Brian
They are used as a way to punish the defendant for their actions. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:44 am by Brian
They are used as a way to punish the defendant for their actions. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:38 am
Williams, 902 F.2d 678, 680-81 (8th Cir. 1990) (an ultraviolet light examination does not constitute a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment); Williams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:36 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Shadur dismissed this case without prejudice as to all defendants based upon plaintiff's failure to serve any of the 300 Doe defendants within the required 120 days pursuant to Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
  This letter runs 70 pages, and here is an early paragraph that sets forth some of the defenders' views and themes:The new advisory system is a healthy one. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 8:41 pm
Sexual harassment is the hardest employee claim to defend against. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:31 am
The Court said that "if a potential defendant with self-interest in objecting is in fact at the door and objects, the co-tenant's permission does not suffice for a reasonable search, whereas the potential objector, nearby but not invited to take part in the threshold colloquy, loses out. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 12:51 pm
The state does not necessarily have to prove the defendant actually actually completed the sexual act or even paid for it. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am by INFORRM
  While the attempts of libel defendants to fight off claims by justifying what they have said often result in the claimant being put through the wringer at trial (the situation in the recent case of Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB)), the defence here is at the extreme end of the spectrum: the meaning which the Defendant seeks to prove is that the Claimant, who does not currently stand convicted of any offence, is probably a murderer. [read post]