Search for: "Fox v. Fox" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Capancioni, 2018 ONCA 173 https://t.co/pdnfSRq939 2018-03-02 TVAddons and ZemTV Should Stand Trial in the US, Dish Tells Court https://t.co/qigJTgEaJx 2018-03-02 Europe Calls for More Action to Fight Illegal Content Online https://t.co/GSIE5difiN 2018-03-02 Take notice copyright infringers: Canadian courts still think intellectual-property laws matter https://t.co/R0LdJdKyWz 2018-03-02 Judge Saris Opines on Copyright Infringement in 3-D Greeting Card Case https://t.co/SutQkm8lJo 2018-03-02 Video… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm by Daithí
Anyway, over to the wonderful world of the FCC, where the decision in FCC v Fox (PDF) does appear to have something very important to say about broadcast regulation and the ongoing life of the 1978 Pacifica decision, FCC v Pacifica 438 US 726, about those seven words mentioned in the introduction to this post. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:49 am by Judith Robinson
[i]       Kellogg Co. v Kellogg, [1941] S.C.R. 242, [1941] 2 DLR. 545 [ii]       Clopay Corp. v Metalix Ltd. (1960), 34 C.P.R..232, 20 Fox Pat. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Harris [2014] EWHC 1568 is a judgment of Mr Justice Barling (the president of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, when he’s not hearing IP cases), the next chapter in the Newzbin piracy saga.Background – Newzbin and the first ever UK blocking injunctionAnyone with an interest in online copyright infringement and blocking injunctions (one of this Kat’s favourite topics) will remember Newzbin as a service which helped its… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The relevance of Murdoch’s leadership of the US Fox Corporation and its role in the January 6 riots was discussed at length. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
For those of you wondering, Justice Scalia voted for tribal interests in Holyfield, Potawatomi (presumably on the immunity issue alone), Sac and Fox (Bill Rice’s case), Kiowa, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm by Christine Dowling
  For instance last week, Alito authored the majority opinion in Davis v. [read post]