Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 3121 - 3140 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles  J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various… [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:13 am by Jani
The position presented in the case differs drastically to what has been discussed in the United States, where programs can be protected by copyright. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
 That provision states that "the Court of Appeal will seek to take into account the fact that a case was in the Shorter Trials Scheme... [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:42 pm
More pithily, Lord Hoffmann noted in Merrell Dow [1996] RPR 76 noted that “An invention is a piece of information. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings Satisfactory Remedy – 11792-22 Caves v thestar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 11834-22 Phillips v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – Sanction: publication of correction 11954-22 Lord v Rochdale Observer, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 5 Reporting suicide (2021), No breach – after investigation 13109-22 National LGBT+ Police Network v The Sunday… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 – Action against persons not domiciled in the UK or an EU/Lugano Convention State Section 9 provides that the court will not have jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim where the prospective defendant is resident outside of the UK, European Union, or the Lugano Convention states (Norway, Switzerl [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
Al-Ameri (FC) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2004) UKHL 4 also offered some support for Mr R, in Lord Bingham’s view that a choice between destitution and another option was not a choice at all. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am by Michael Scutt
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of G) v The Governors of School X probably  not if you’re a teacher in a state school. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am by INFORRM
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 9:51 pm by Simon Gibbs
I referred the judge to paragraphs 113-116 and 223 of Hollins v Russell [2003] EWCA Civ. 718). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Like Lady Poole, Lord Brailsford is a Senator of the College of Justice. [read post]