Search for: "Paul v. Paul"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 12,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
See Vintage Rodeo Parent, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:22 am
The case is Hunt v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:42 am
The 2011 case of Settle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
Dudas: Amicus Briefs at the Federal Circuit Paul Cole, Patentability of Computer Software As Such Anticipated yet Nonobvious [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
Gente sem vínculo com o submundo que conhece a outra face do barão da droga, a de festeiro em rodas de pagode e de incentivador do Carnaval e do futebol de várzea. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:14 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:30 am
Lyons v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:04 pm
Craig v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
First, I read a provocative essay by Paul Butler, "Poor People Lose: Gideon and the Critique of Rights," in the Yale Law Journal's most recent issue, which contains over twenty articles (all available for free download) by law professors and lawyers reflecting on the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 8:11 am
Paul, Minnesota, ruled in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:07 am
In the final ruling issued today, Justice John Paul Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
Here are the materials in Bellfy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:13 am
Silk, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:53 am
Ravens v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm
Indeed, before her last year's service as Solicitor General, her most prominent litigation effort was probably having signed onto a wrongheaded amicus brief in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am
Paul, 505 U.S., at 402, n. 4 (White, J., concurring in judgment) (citing Brandenburg v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
"The high court disagreed, reversing the appeals court's decision.Federal law "authorizes federally appointed counsel to represent their clients in state clemency proceedings and entitles them to compensation for that representation," said Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the court.Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, saying the applicable statute "is most naturally and coherently read to provide federally funded counsel to capital defendants… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:55 pm
Supreme Court case Bruton v. [read post]
