Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
In White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The originality standard is a minimal degree of creativity as stipulated in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
” Interestingly, the Fifth Circuit also commented on the pending appeal in the matter of Island Operating, Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
” Interestingly, the Fifth Circuit also commented on the pending appeal in the matter of Island Operating, Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
Seattle Title Trust Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Anne Peters (Director of the Heidelberg Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law) and Lawfare’s editor, Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Walt Disney Co., 202 F.3d 1199, 1207 (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
In Raza Buland Sugar Co. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court rejected Sprint’s reliance on Preston v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
These 1992 results suggest that, at that time, the public had little stomach for further restriction of abortion rights, censorship, or preventing access to abortion services. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Luminant Generating Co., LLC, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
SXH v Crown Prosecution Service, heard 19 July 2016. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Some of the relevant publications were Safety Review, starting in 1944, United States Navy Medicine, The Naval Medical Bulletin, and United States Navy Medical News Letter. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:03 pm
WD-40 Co., 792 F.3d at 722. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
To write about a constitutional phenomenon so intimately (if sometimes incorrectly) linked in the minds of specialists and of the reading public with the protection of slavery and the destruction of the union is to be forced by conference audiences, editors, and students to take a position on whether state challenges to federal law are in general a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ thing. [read post]
