Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 7,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
SOCAN, SOCAN v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
SOCAN, SOCAN v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
In Sawyer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
Fictional characters themselves are protected by copyright. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
Jazz music to Jazztel's ears, the Supreme Court upheld the Madrid Court’s decision, possibly putting the nail in the coffin of Orange’s (squared) colour monopoly dream in Spain.Also recalling previous Spanish and EU case-law (among other things, the CJEU decisions in Case 104/01, Liberteland in Case C-49/02, Bauchemie), the Supreme Court stated that colours generally lack of distinctive character and cannot play a proper distinctive role, as consumers… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:37 pm
The landmark Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
The district court found the village liable under the Fair Housing Act for intentional discrimination, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is MHANY Management v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Wizkids/NECA, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm
” The first civil-law counterpart to Oliphant was issued just three years later in Montana v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
United States, 156 U.S. 432; 15 S. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
Banigan & Templin, et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 5:38 pm
Judgement, THE PROSECUTOR v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
