Search for: "State v. F. T."
Results 3121 - 3140
of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
”[20] These operations hurt governments, who lose out on revenue; consumers, because the products often don’t adhere to health standards; legal businesses, which cannot compete with illicit products; and the general respect of the law. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:31 pm
Shenandoah Valley, 669 F.3d at 196. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217, 224 (3d Cir.1995); see also Koch v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Doggett v The Travis Law Firm, P.C. f/k/a Travis & Hammond, P.C. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
Transp., Inc., 82 F.3d 484 (D.C.Cir.1996), violations of Connecticut transportation laws and regulations aren’t actionable as false advertising; given that it wasn’t clear whether state transportation laws applied to Uber, Uber’s representations that it complied with the law couldn’t be false or misleading. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
You haven't heard his name before and no one in the United States has even cared enough to make a Wikipedia page for him in English, even though our museums are full of works that passed through his hands. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 11:17 am
Applying United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:03 pm
The United State Supreme Court in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm
Surgikos, Inc., 864 F. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
” Morrow v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
New York City Dep’t of Ed. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Henley, 766 F.3d 893, 911–12 (8th Cir.2014); United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm
What I think is notable about the decision is (1) the number of times that the Court noted that things are different now from the 1999 MOVIE BUFF decision (Brookfield v West Coast Entertainment, 174 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir 1999)); (2) it could have gone the Initial Interest Confusion route on this one, and didn't. [read post]
