Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3121 - 3140 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2018, 7:15 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The district court denied the motion for reconsideration on June 24, 2015. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The Supreme Court had an opportunity to address that issue last term in Lozman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Of the brief’s three points, the first, about statistical significance is the most important for epidemiologic and legal practice. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The ICE detainer and arrest warrant were transferred along with him.On December 11, 2017, Francis pleaded guilty in Suffolk County District Court to one count of disorderly conduct. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
”  The district court ultimately denied SMA’s motion for vacatur, stated its decision was final and appealable, and stayed the arbitral proceedings. [read post]
On November 1, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District affirmed a trial court’s ruling in AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Sean Fine reports for the Toronto Globe and Mail that, during a public discussion with a justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice Elena Kagan told the audience that “[t]he partisan process for judicial nomination hearings in the United States is harmful to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for the first opinion of the term, in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
” Smith responded by stating the trial court may “not review the arbitrator’s award because the arbitration provision is final and binding and does not allow for expanded judicial review. [read post]